That’s right ladies, cut the bullshit, you know yourself deep enough not to play the stupid games men entice us to play all day long. Let’s take a look at how men behaved around women in the stone ages. It’s true men were hunters and gatherers for their women and children, and were the dominant sex in the animal kingdom. They didn’t have to give too much thought where the next staple of food would come from and freely scathed around for women they desired. Among the strongest in the pack were the alpha males who seeked the most attractive woman to mate with and medalled with among the beta males. They were the natural born leaders of the male group, the big grizzly bears unafraid of its predators. Alpha males are physically strong hunters, love to prowl around for the attention of new females, and intimidate the males who are head strong by hitting on all the women, especially in night club scenes.
In modernity, some men, generally still hold onto some part
of this Neanderthal instinct, constantly flirting among the ladies in the game
to win their attention, purely for a new sexual experience. I was recently was
told by an alpha male himself, during a sexual encounter that he and his mates
feel the need to prowl around night clubs, in a pack of boys of course, and
behave wildly as animals chasing the first girl they lay eyes on. Is there a
man code for not stealing the others prey? Absoloutely not. When I asked this
guy why he felt the urge to talk to the same woman his best mate had started
seeing, he told me, “ us guys see interest in someone and want to push for
that, and don’t stop for anything (or anyone). We like what we see and want
what we want so we will push every boundary until we eventually have it in
front of us.” This begs the question, where does man code come into the prize
draw? The funny thing is he knows he can get as many random chicks in a night
club, (most probably an easier target) but chooses to fight over his best mate’s
girl because she is the most out of reach. Is this a dog act towards his best
mate unaware he is ‘chatting’ his girlfriend up or is this perfectly okay under
man code? Unfortunately for us, ladies, it is the latter in this scenario. Men
do and will behave like animals fighting over the more challenging prey,
perfectly acceptable in man code, to break it down to five unthinkable words,
“he wouldn’t blink an eye.”
As we evolved as species women were challenged to constantly
think for themselves, left alone to nurture their young offspring and
contemplate if their men were going to come back with sufficient food for them.
We constantly battled in our heads how we would survive if there were no food
supply that day. Always analytical, women became over thinkers, unsure how the
man’s behaviour would affect their survival needs. We needed a strong alpha
male to act in a decent manner, capable of fighting off any predators in their
way of their prey (or prize).
So should we think the modern man’s behaviour still shows
signs of Neanderthal instinct? That the bro code doesn’t apply to certain alpha
males whose natural instinct is to prance on the sexiest unattainable women, so
far fetched and most probably out of his league, he needs to acknowledge his
alpha male- good looking genes, and boast his sexuality left, right and centre only
for a fleeting sexual encounter? It’s a perfect example why so many young,
naive women lose their ability to deny this deviant behaviour, because the
players play the game so well, the strong characteristics of the alpha male
outweighs the male’s hidden motif. Just as soon as women let their guard down
and see signs he legitimately has good intentions to fight any battle, and protect
and provide for us, their behaviour suddenly changes and lands us in a
dangerous territorial ground for many, many women.
And it doesn’t end there either, in fact an alpha male who cannot
mature into his primal stage, equivalent to attaining dominance and
intimidation beyond the physical ‘women hunt’ phase, in providing a living for
their family and endure a successful career, will repeatedly stay in this Neanderthal
stage for as long as possible.
It makes perfectly good sense as to why relationships are
doomed from the beginning if a woman’s needs are not met by good intentions of
a man. Women will ask a million and one questions from a guy to draw a
conclusion whether he makes the cut to fill the role of a strong, honest,
compassionate and most importantly extremely attractive guy/companion. Having
asked women about what attracts them to their male partner, if it was love at
first sight over fatal attraction; it more than likely is, because the brain
automatically calculates the decision of sexual chemistry within the first
three seconds. However, skip over a couple hundreds of generations and you will
see the roles have reversed. We now know women’s brains have evolved to be more
analytical than a mans, helping women to cope with the stress of independently
fending on her own. A relationship in hindsight that starts with a sexual
encounter based on its physical chemistry is naturally the key ingredient to
reproducing the strongest offspring. As humans have evolved, we have ideally
created the look we want for our offspring, subconsciously deciding and shaping
the perfect look we desire in our partner. However, there is more to it that
meets the eye, physical attraction is a significant factor, just as an equal or higher intelligence is for the perfect companionship.
Next chapter on fatal attraction versus brains..
No comments:
Post a Comment